Opportunities Today : November 2008 Issue

What Ails Quality in College Education?

 

K'uan Tzu, a great thinker (551 - 479 BC.) once said:-

“If you plan for a year, plant a seed.
If for ten years, plant a tree.
If for a hundred years, teach the people.
When you sow one seed,
You will reap a single harvest.
When you teach the people,
You will reap a hundred harvests”

 

The philosophy of K'uan Tzu is the 'soul' of education. It is the combination of Virtue, Value and Validity of human life. It has multidimensional implications. It means there is a need to understand the criteria that can help in the development of human beings.A proper Teaching-Learning process is a passport to a comfortable and secure life. This process is transmitted through commitment and sharing of the Teacher-Pupil relationship. Education is not merely imparting knowledge in a particular faculty or subject. Education should be training in pragmatic and logical thinking and should help subsequent generations adjust to their environment. Education should make the student community think and become worldly wise.

A vast number of colleges have arisen in India during the last six decades. Education during the British period was guided by a policy which can be summed up in Macaulay's words, “To create a class who would be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern, a class of persons Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in moral and intellect”; a class who would be loyal to the British Raj. Since 1947, [after independence] the expansion of higher education has led to numerous ways of achieving quality in education. Down the corridors of time, many colleges have been founded on the commitment to search for and disseminate knowledge. The role of colleges has always been important but perhaps never more so in man's history than today. In the modern world, quality education and research are crucial to the development of students. In this volatile atmosphere, one thing is certain: Yesterday's educational system will not meet the needs of today, and even less so, the needs of tomorrow. Stressing quality in education alone can provide the foundation to the nation's Progress, Security and Welfare.

 
Today there is a strong feeling that the education imparted at the college level does not match the needs and expectations of the employment sector. Therefore there is a need for comprehensive improvement of the college environment. The college improvement programme is based solely on the efforts of Management, Principal, Teaching, Non-teaching staff and Students. But the present scenario indicates that the rigidity in the process of planning and its implementation has reflected very badly on the Indian Education System. The efforts of college authorities and staff are directionless and, therefore, ineffective. As a result, development of college education has been receiving low priority in the Indian government. If our education system does not encompass the necessity for students to become optimistic and an integrated part of society, the credibility of our colleges will be doubted. Sceptics, pragmatics and even scientists would voice their apprehension about the present teaching learning practices. Some basic questions may well be asked of the colleges: How far have the colleges succeeded in helping the students? How far has the college culture changed the life of the students? What are the main educational programmes, offerings, and services? Why have the colleges failed to bring in the expected standard? These are critical questions that need to be asked continuously and often even though their answers are difficult.

A major task before the colleges now is to create new Strategies, Policies and Programmes of a revolutionary nature which can bring about quality in education. A disheartening fact of the colleges in India is that there is no fundamental or social understanding in the college campuses. There is no education which can enrich human life. Who is to ensure that quality is maintained? Is it only the Principal or the Teachers too? Yes, as per the statutory provisions, the entire college faculty is responsible for maintaining the standard of education. But our higher education system is such that it does not attempt or even inspire to match the international standards. If the objective is to build a world class system then “Degrees” or “Certificates” would not be enough for faculty recruitment.
 
In view of the ever increasing number of colleges, and the ever-increasing student populace, the problem of providing students with quality education has assumed a serious dimension. Until and unless there are sufficient infrastructures and the best teaching learning facilities in every corner of the country, the aim and objectives of higher education are sure to suffer a setback. So the need of the hour is to build quality institutions in India. The aim and purpose of imparting education must change in response to economic and social changes. The traditional rigid approach to planning and implementing will no longer work. To achieve these objectives, experts within and without the system are to be mobilized for developing higher education programmes.Our colleges are unable to parlay our huge human resources into an asset. Unfortunately the colleges have not yet evolved from conventional courses of study. It is equally true that our education fails to teach team work and communication skills.

 There is no fine tuning of teachers and students. The indiscipline, protest and disruptive activities on the part of students are at times instigated by the teachers themselves as well as political parties. The teachers', students' and non-teaching staff's unions instead of taking up educational causes, frequently take-up populist causes and easily succeed in disrupting the daily functioning of a college. Politics and groupism in colleges have damaged the standard of higher education. Our graduates therefore have no demand in job markets. The colleges in India seem to be far behind their counterparts in U.S.A., U.K. and Australia in terms of quality education and research. What is disconcerting and worrisome is that the non-academic environment of the colleges has the worst impact on educational and moral values of the society. Although India has more than 365 Universities and 18000 colleges with more than 5.5 Lakh teachers catering to 10.5 million students, it caters to only 9% of the relevant age group. But in the larger context it is found that there is no alternative device to ensure International Standards in higher education. The major problem lies in sticking to a teacher-centric environment, which largely focuses on the convenience of the teachers and ignores expectations of the students. The mechanical way of useless teaching, lack of understanding about the aim of higher education often results in deviating from the philosophy of higher education. The Universities are awarding degree certificates to students without ensuring anything related to quality. This has surely and steadily affected the present education system in an adverse manner. It is a fact that people pursue a degree for the status it carries.
 
The teachers deliver lectures without employment of a proper teaching methodology. Too often the teacher does not have the time or the inclination to ensure whether the students could follow the lecture. Sometimes we come across teachers who merely dictate notes. There are instances of teachers just reading aloud from the text-book or the guide. It is also observed that learning at college level does not include acquisition of habits or skills. Current evaluation and testing only stress upon rote memory. The curriculum design is a mere 'Collection' of topics and subjects. There is no genuine comprehension or critical evaluation. The accumulation and presentation of data alone cannot become the criteria for quality education. Promoting students from one class to another for maintaining the work-load of the teachers is a common phenomenon. It means the colleges are simply enrolment centres and examination bodies. They are not bothered about the quality of teaching. Neither is there any procedure to check the kind of teaching that is imparted at the college.

In light of the above vitiated scenario, there is a need for fresh thinking on the issue of college education. Francis Marion Crawford rightly said “It makes little difference what the trade, business, or branch of learning is, in mechanical labour, or intellectual effort, the educated man is always superior to the common labourer. One who is in the habit of applying his powers in the right way will carry a system into any occupation, and it will help him as much to handle a rope as to write a poem”. It means the philosophy of positive education resulting in provision of suitable culture where students can develop their creative, intellectual and mental personality is of utmost significance. The present day needs of colleges are:
 
1) to realise that education is a dynamic and a continuously changing process and

2) to realise that a college is not merely a building but a part of the global village.

To meet the above cited needs, colleges require a very innovative and informative approach. It is a fact that growth of colleges has taken place without commitment and proper infrastructural facilities, as a result of which a large number of unproductive students are produced. If this is so, what should the colleges do? It would help tremendously if efforts are made to:-

1) Establish the links between colleges and industry with the social and economic goals of society in mind.

2) Improve the governance of colleges.

3) Mobilize resources.

4) Introduce a Multi-disciplinary approach to education.

5) Create a working environment in colleges.

6) Make provisions of well-equipped laboratories, employment of modern technology and good libraries.

7) Improve quality, relevance and standards of higher education through renewal of curriculum.
 
The colleges neither care for the community nor respect the welfare of others. No importance is given to human relations which is a highly pertinent matter required for effective education. There is no encouragement or appreciation of responsibility, self-discipline and other such virtues. There is no projection of the college as the servant of the society.

The words of William James, a great Psychologist are much relevant in this regard:-
Sow an action and
You reap a habit
Sow a habit and
You reap a Character
Sow a character and
You reap a destiny.

It means colleges should provide hope and open new avenues for the student community. Colleges should enable students to become contributory members of society by providing knowledge, skills and character development opportunities. Every student should be enabled to acquire the tools and qualifications necessary for earning his living. The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for good citizenship in a democratic society where tolerance, goodwill, responsibility and accountability are deeply integrated in life.
 
At present, the college administrative system is following a redundant and ineffective procedure. Imparting quality education not only means providing the necessary facilities, but also creating an intellectually stimulating environment. In this context, the novel and creative skills of students should be encouraged. For exposure and training in modern technology, there is a need for teachers who are innovative and enterprising besides being learned and qualified. But at the college level, the teachers' apathy towards student development is deplorable. Students are not motivated to improve their self-study skills. Therefore it is high time that colleges make an integrated effort to make the various challenges of the modern day by broadening their vision and progressing in the right direction.

While deliberating upon the problems in the field of higher education one has to perceive the situation in totality. Colleges are unable to lead the students toward the fulfilment of social needs or a complete adoption of advanced technological skills. Colleges should become knowledge-based learning centres. There has to be an explicit change in the attitude of students, teachers, principal as well as the management. Without adopting a humanistic approach, colleges would fail to achieve the goal of quality in education. It is time therefore to rethink and revise the environment of the college campus and devise a strategy that would work towards a Quality Culture. When there is no compromise in the quality of education, change is certain and progress is inevitable.
 
Editor's Note: Principal M. S. Kurhade, besides being an established and dedicated educationist, is a staunch proponent of the ideology that a complete education transcends textbooks and lecture halls. In his own bold way this modest man is creating opportunities for under-represented sections of society by not only effectively administrating his college for full-time students, but also helping students to pursue higher education through distance-learning, by developing information and enrolment facilities as well as a help centre. With his sharp mind focussed on education for “self-reliance” he does not mince words in explicitly describing what ails our education system. He also puts forward his simple suggestions for a solution. We wish for more learned persons such as M. S. Kurhade to take the helm of education institutes and instil in future generations the concept of a complete education; for the mind, body, and soul.
 

Email this article